Alexis Fidetzis | Undesirable Past

Photo: Alexis Fidetzis and To Vima Archive

In August 1989, the Greek government ordered the destruction of police files documenting the political affiliations of its citizens—archives accumulated over half a century. Soon, the files were incinerated at the Chalivourgiki Steel factory in Athens. The Greek public widely accepted this decision, though some historians argued that these records could have provided critical insights into how state power was wielded against the country’s citizens. This project aims to view the act of destroying these material archives as a metaphor for the evolution of power itself, from tangible forms of control to the immaterial, decentralized systems of our era.

“Undesirable Past” uses this pivotal moment as a starting point to explore the evolving nature of power in the digital age. During the residency, Fidetzis plans to engage with this theme through a combination of research, material experimentation, and collaborative dialogue. His work will begin with the use of archival material from ASKI (The Archives of Contemporary Social History), while metalworking techniques will be employed to produce original pieces that echo the visual language of the archives. The pieces that will serve as the starting point of an archival installation are to be made of steel—a material choice that not only ties back to the Chalivourgiki Steel factory but also symbolizes strength and permanence, inviting reflection on themes of erasure and resilience. Additionally, Fidetzis will be collaborating with Dr. Vangelis Karamanolakis, a professor of history at the University of Athens and author of the principal book on the files’ destruction. Together, they plan to examine how institutional control has transformed, by becoming increasingly abstract in recent decades.

In a nutshell, this project aims to serve as a platform for critically engaging with the intersection of materiality and power, questioning how control is both constructed and contested. The shift in traditional institutions of control raises a profound and central question: How can artists construct their material worlds that interrogate power structures, when power itself has become increasingly detached from matter? By reflecting on the destruction of material elements of power, “Undesirable Past” invites us to consider the ways in which control has evolved into something invisible yet omnipresent, challenging us to rethink how we resist and respond to it.

Photo: Alexis Fidetzis

Creator's Note

Before the official launch of the residency, I had already been in touch with the research team at the Contemporary Social History Archives (ASKI). That initial contact proved invaluable, as they granted me access to original source material that became the foundation of my research.

It is well known that most of Greece’s 17 million political affiliation files—state dossiers documenting the political loyalties and activities of citizens—were destroyed in 1989. A relatively small number of files relating to prominent historical and political figures, however, remain in the archives of the Greek police. One of the country’s leading political figures of the twentieth century had previously requested a copy of his own file and donated it to ASKI for research and preservation. Access to this material paved the way for my own investigation.

The first stage of my project consisted of archival research, during which I sought to identify specific systems of classification within the file. Among the many documents it contained, I ultimately chose to focus on those relating to the subject’s surveillance by the security services. Through this material, I hoped not only to shed light on a brutal chapter of Greece’s recent history but also to explore questions that remain deeply relevant today.

My research revealed that the archive effectively documents two of the principal mechanisms through which authoritarian regimes exercise what is often described as ‘soft power’: the surveillance of individuals deemed politically suspect and the censorship of the press, which determines the information available to the public.

Willey Reveley

Panopticon, 1791

As the project developed—and through conversations with fellow residents—I began to recognize striking parallels with contemporary forms of surveillance and information control shaped by our relationship with the internet and social media. Within the framework of what has been termed ‘surveillance capitalism,’ our online activity has itself become a commodity. This process feeds the algorithms that determine both the type and quantity of information we consume, profoundly influencing our behavior and ultimately our political consciousness. At the same time, it is important to acknowledge that we participate in this process voluntarily, willingly providing the data that shifts power away from centralized state surveillance and toward large corporations and powerful technology oligarchs.

In light of these considerations, I began to explore which artistic methods might enable a connection between archival material and an embodied, experiential encounter, through which viewers could engage with the archive directly, reflect on contemporary conditions of surveillance, and recognize their own place within them.

This line of inquiry prompted a series of experiments exploring different configurations for the installation. I investigated questions of scale as well as archetypal architectural forms associated with modern surveillance, such as the Panopticon. Seeking to bridge the distance between archival research and lived contemporary experience, I also began a dialogue with philosopher Nikos Erinakis, whose recent book, “The Hyperdialectics of Eutopia,” examines many of the issues that had come to occupy my thinking, especially the emergence of new forms of sociality and relationships among individuals, society, and technology.

Photo: Alexis Fidetzis

I was fortunate that he accepted my invitation to participate in a public conversation during the residency’s Open Days. Together, we shared these ideas with a broader audience and reflected on the questions they raise. Our discussion ultimately led us to conclude that, within today’s highly charged social and technological landscape, it is essential to reconsider the artist’s relationship with both audiences and the community at large.

When a work is conceived with the primary aim of engaging a community, the artist’s methods and formal choices must now, more than ever, take into account the conditions of its reception. They must acknowledge the possibility that the viewer may become—quite literally—incorporated into the work’s conceptual structure. Ultimately, the deeper purpose of artistic practice does not lie merely in producing an object. Rather, it lies in creating the conditions for meaningful dialogue and genuine, reciprocal exchange.

CONVERSATION WITH NIKOS ERINAKIS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ONASSIS AIR SPRING OPEN DAYS 2026

    Image 1 / 3

    Photo: Pinelopi Gerasimou

    Image 2 / 3

    Photo: Pinelopi Gerasimou

    Image 3 / 3

    Photo: Pinelopi Gerasimou

As I conclude what has been an exceptionally productive period of research and artistic development, I hope the appropriate context will emerge for the realization of the project in its complete form. The finished installation would offer audiences the opportunity to engage with the archive through a direct, embodied experience.

DETAILS FROM THE INSTALLATION DURING THE ONASSIS AIR SPRING OPEN DAYS 2026

    Image 1 / 4

    Photo: Pinelopi Gerasimou

    Image 2 / 4

    Photo: Pinelopi Gerasimou

    Image 3 / 4

    Photo: Pinelopi Gerasimou

    Image 4 / 4

    Photo: Pinelopi Gerasimou