Konstantinos Papanikolaou | The Rashomon Effect
The term ‘Rashomon effect’ refers to the phenomenon where a single event can be interpreted in multiple ways due to the subjectivity of the witnesses. This results from differences in social and cultural background, as well as individual perspectives. In this particular case, the choreographer places his own work under the same lens. After first creating a solo movement piece—approximately 15 minutes long—and presenting it to the audience, he repeats the exact same performance four more times, each time accompanied by the recorded commentary of a different person.
First, a dance theorist offers an explanation based on their professional knowledge and criteria. Then comes a regular audience member, followed by the producer of the performance. Finally, the choreographer himself speaks, sharing the story behind the piece and commenting on how it was composed.
While the performance remains unchanged, with each repetition, the audience becomes increasingly aware of just how subjective artistic interpretation can be. At the same time, they witness how each person, depending on their position in the production chain, perceives the work in a completely different way.
The piece aims to explore how representation functions on stage and to question whether what professional creators propose truly resonates with—or relates to—the audience they address.
Photo: Konstantinos Papanikolaou
During the Onassis AiR residency, I studied the phenomenon known as the “Rashomon effect,” which highlights subjectivity in the perception of an event and, in the context of my research, in the perception of an artistic work in particular. Based on this, I created and presented to the public a ten-minute solo movement piece that revolves around the idea of failure.
Photo: Konstantinos Papanikolaou
My methodology focused on studio composition and the exploration of music, movement choices, and costume design that would support the narrative. Once the filming was finalized, I shared the work with different theorists and practitioners in the field and documented their responses. The process was then extended to an audience with little or no familiarity with contemporary dance, as well as to art producers. Each perspective added a unique interpretation, highlighting the subjectivity of artistic judgment and individual expectations. Various members of the residency community actively participated in this process – from mentors and certain fellows to office staff and technical personnel. Collecting feedback from this broad range of participants formulated the basis for writing texts to analyse their responses. These texts may later be recorded and incorporated into the final presentation.
Photo: Konstantinos Papanikolaou
The outward-facing nature of the residency turned out to be pivotal. The opportunity to collaborate with artists and curators from different fields enriched my research. More specifically, the diversity of the Onassis AiR people allowed me to conduct interviews with individuals from various disciplines, further strengthening the work’s pluralistic approach.
More in:
Carol Sansour: I can’t talk about this on the phone…
News







